Get a Quote
Selection July 26, 2026 • 7 min read

Trapezoidal vs Ball Screw Jacks — When Each Wins

Both sit in a worm gear screw jack housing. The lifting screw type decides hold behaviour, duty cycle, motor size, and maintenance — not the paint colour.

Anand Gears supplies machine screw jacks from 5 kN to 350 kN with either a trapezoidal (Tr) lifting screw or a ball screw. The worm gearbox on top looks similar; the linear element decides efficiency, heat, and whether the load stays put when power dies. This is a buyer-facing comparison — no brand theatre.

Trapezoidal (Tr) screw jacks

A trapezoidal thread works like a power screw: sliding contact between steel screw and bronze nut. Typical industrial efficiency is on the order of 35–45% (product literature). That sliding friction is exactly why properly pitched Tr screws with suitable worm ratios are often self-locking — the load does not unwind when the motor stops.

Where Tr wins

  • Infrequent lifts and long hold periods (press tables, platforms, gates, mould height)
  • Safety preference for mechanical hold without relying on a brake
  • Cost-sensitive capacity in the same kN class
  • Simpler field maintenance — grease, inspect nut backlash, replace bellows
  • Intermittent duty that matches classic worm jack thermal limits

Trade-offs — more input power for a given lift speed; more heat under high cycle rates; nut wear is the planned life limiter (monitor with a safety nut).

Ball screw jacks

Ball screws roll recirculating balls between screw and nut. Efficiency can reach about 90% on the same product material — much less friction, less heat for a given speed, smaller motor for frequent cycling.

Where ball wins

  • High duty cycle and frequent positioning
  • Faster lift rates without overheating the worm mesh
  • Lower input power for the same linear work
  • Precision-oriented moves where smooth response matters

Trade-offs — ball screws need a brake (or other hold) when power is off; they cost more in the same capacity class; contamination control (bellows, seals) matters more because ball tracks hate grit.

Side-by-side

Topic Trapezoidal (Tr) Ball screw
Efficiency (order of magnitude)~35–45%up to ~90%
Self-locking holdOften yes (check pitch/ratio)No — use brake
Duty cycleIntermittent preferredHigh cycling preferred
Motor sizeLarger for same speedSmaller for same speed
ContaminationTolerant with good greaseSensitive — protect tracks
Typical buyer priorityHold + economySpeed + duty

Decision shortcuts

  • Must hold without power, few moves per hour → Tr trapezoidal.
  • Many cycles per hour, motor size tight → ball screw + brake.
  • Unsure → state duty cycle and hold requirement on the RFQ; we will not force a ball screw where self-locking is the real need.

Both types are available across the catalogue capacity band in TP/TPR configurations — see machine screw jacks and sizing notes in how to size a screw jack.

Related: Screw Jack vs Hydraulic · Maintenance & Lubrication · Contact

Talk to Anand Gears

Tell us duty cycle, hold requirement, load (kN), and stroke (mm). We recommend Tr or ball within the 5–350 kN line.

Contact / Request a Quote